Conversational Defaults IT by Leonardo Boselli

Version 3

"Translation in italian of Version 3 of Conversational Defaults by Eric Eve. Provides a set of rules to facilitate defining default conversational responses for different conversational commands targeted at various NPCs. This extension requires Conversation Framework."

Error

Includes and Included by are omitted for modules with errors

ni

++ 0% (Reading text)
++ 5% (Analysing sentences)
++ 15% (Drawing inferences)
++ 20% (Binding rulebooks)
++ 23% (Binding rulebooks)
++ 26% (Binding rulebooks)
++ 29% (Binding rulebooks)
++ 32% (Binding rulebooks)
++ 35% (Binding rulebooks)
++ 38% (Binding rulebooks)
++ 41% (Generating code)
++ 44% (Generating code)
++ 47% (Generating code)
++ 50% (Generating code)
++ 53% (Generating code)
++ 56% (Generating code)
++ 59% (Generating code)
++ 62% (Generating code)
++ 65% (Generating code)
++ 68% (Generating code)
++ 71% (Generating code)
++ 74% (Generating code)
++ 77% (Generating code)
++ 80% (Generating code)
++ 83% (Generating code)
++ 86% (Generating code)
++ 89% (Generating code)
++ 92% (Generating code)
++ 95% (Generating code)
++ 98% (Generating code)


In the line '"[The noun] non [rispondi]."' conversation framework it by leonardo
boselli, I was expecting that
'rispondi' would be something to 'say', but it didn't look like any form of
'say' that I know. So I tried to read 'rispondi' as a value of some kind
(because it's legal to say values), but couldn't make sense of it that way
either. Sometimes this happens because punctuation has gone wrong - for
instance, if you've omitted a semicolon or full stop at the end of the
'say' phrase.


In the line '"[regarding the player][maiuscolo][ [...] do con [the
current interlocutor]."' conversation framework it by leonardo
boselli, I was expecting that
'maiuscolo' would be something to 'say', but it didn't look like any form
of 'say' that I know. So I tried to read 'maiuscolo' as a value of some
kind (because it's legal to say values), but couldn't make sense of it that
way either. Sometimes this happens because punctuation has gone wrong -
for instance, if you've omitted a semicolon or full stop at the end of the
'say' phrase.


In the line '"[regarding the player][maiuscolo][ [...] do con [the
current interlocutor]."' conversation framework it by leonardo
boselli, I was expecting that
'stai' would be something to 'say', but it didn't look like any form of
'say' that I know. So I tried to read 'stai' as a value of some kind
(because it's legal to say values), but couldn't make sense of it that way
either. Sometimes this happens because punctuation has gone wrong - for
instance, if you've omitted a semicolon or full stop at the end of the
'say' phrase.


In the line '"[regarding the player][maiuscolo][ [...] do con [the
current interlocutor]."' conversation framework it by leonardo
boselli, I was expecting that
'maiuscolo' would be something to 'say', but it didn't look like any form
of 'say' that I know. So I tried to read 'maiuscolo' as a value of some
kind (because it's legal to say values), but couldn't make sense of it that
way either. Sometimes this happens because punctuation has gone wrong -
for instance, if you've omitted a semicolon or full stop at the end of the
'say' phrase.


In the line '"Non [regarding nothing][ci sei] nessun altro [qui]."' conversation framework it by leonardo
boselli, I was expecting that 'ci
sei' would be something to 'say', but it didn't look like any form of 'say'
that I know. So I tried to read 'ci sei' as a value of some kind (because
it's legal to say values), but couldn't make sense of it that way either.
Sometimes this happens because punctuation has gone wrong - for instance,
if you've omitted a semicolon or full stop at the end of the 'say' phrase.


In the line '"Non [regarding nothing][ci sei] nessun altro [qui]."' conversation framework it by leonardo
boselli, I was expecting that 'qui'
would be something to 'say', but it didn't look like any form of 'say' that
I know. So I tried to read 'qui' as a value of some kind (because it's
legal to say values), but couldn't make sense of it that way either.
Sometimes this happens because punctuation has gone wrong - for instance,
if you've omitted a semicolon or full stop at the end of the 'say' phrase.


In the line '"[regarding the player][maiuscolo][saluti][maiuscolo] [the
noun]."' conversation
framework it by leonardo boselli, I was expecting that 'maiuscolo' would be
something to 'say', but it didn't look like any form of 'say' that I know.
So I tried to read 'maiuscolo' as a value of some kind (because it's legal
to say values), but couldn't make sense of it that way either. Sometimes
this happens because punctuation has gone wrong - for instance, if you've
omitted a semicolon or full stop at the end of the 'say' phrase.


In the line '"[regarding the player][maiuscolo][saluti][maiuscolo] [the
noun]."' conversation
framework it by leonardo boselli, I was expecting that 'saluti' would be
something to 'say', but it didn't look like any form of 'say' that I know.
So I tried to read 'saluti' as a value of some kind (because it's legal to
say values), but couldn't make sense of it that way either. Sometimes this
happens because punctuation has gone wrong - for instance, if you've
omitted a semicolon or full stop at the end of the 'say' phrase.


In the line '"[regarding the player][maiuscolo][saluti][maiuscolo] [the
noun]."' conversation
framework it by leonardo boselli, I was expecting that 'maiuscolo' would be
something to 'say', but it didn't look like any form of 'say' that I know.
So I tried to read 'maiuscolo' as a value of some kind (because it's legal
to say values), but couldn't make sense of it that way either. Sometimes
this happens because punctuation has gone wrong - for instance, if you've
omitted a semicolon or full stop at the end of the 'say' phrase.


In the line '"Non [regarding nothing][ci sei] stata risposta."' conversation framework it by leonardo
boselli, I was expecting that 'ci
sei' would be something to 'say', but it didn't look like any form of 'say'
that I know. So I tried to read 'ci sei' as a value of some kind (because
it's legal to say values), but couldn't make sense of it that way either.
Sometimes this happens because punctuation has gone wrong - for instance,
if you've omitted a semicolon or full stop at the end of the 'say' phrase.


In the line '"Non [regarding nothing][ci sei] stata risposta."' conversation framework it by leonardo
boselli, I was expecting that 'ci
sei' would be something to 'say', but it didn't look like any form of 'say'
that I know. So I tried to read 'ci sei' as a value of some kind (because
it's legal to say values), but couldn't make sense of it that way either.
Sometimes this happens because punctuation has gone wrong - for instance,
if you've omitted a semicolon or full stop at the end of the 'say' phrase.


In the line '"[Qui] non [regarding nothing][ci sei] nessuno a cui
parlare."' conversation framework it by leonardo
boselli, I was expecting that 'Qui'
would be something to 'say', but it didn't look like any form of 'say' that
I know. So I tried to read 'Qui' as a value of some kind (because it's
legal to say values), but couldn't make sense of it that way either.
Sometimes this happens because punctuation has gone wrong - for instance,
if you've omitted a semicolon or full stop at the end of the 'say' phrase.


In the line '"[Qui] non [regarding nothing][ci sei] nessuno a cui
parlare."' conversation framework it by leonardo
boselli, I was expecting that 'ci
sei' would be something to 'say', but it didn't look like any form of 'say'
that I know. So I tried to read 'ci sei' as a value of some kind (because
it's legal to say values), but couldn't make sense of it that way either.
Sometimes this happens because punctuation has gone wrong - for instance,
if you've omitted a semicolon or full stop at the end of the 'say' phrase.


In the line '"(rivolgendoti [ap the interlocutor])"' conversation framework it by leonardo
boselli, I was expecting that 'ap
the interlocutor' would be something to 'say', but it didn't look like any
form of 'say' that I know. So I tried to read 'ap the interlocutor' as a
value of some kind (because it's legal to say values), but couldn't make
sense of it that way either. Sometimes this happens because punctuation
has gone wrong - for instance, if you've omitted a semicolon or full stop
at the end of the 'say' phrase.


In the line '"Non [regarding the player][stai] parlando con nessuno."' conversation framework it by leonardo
boselli, I was expecting that
'stai' would be something to 'say', but it didn't look like any form of
'say' that I know. So I tried to read 'stai' as a value of some kind
(because it's legal to say values), but couldn't make sense of it that way
either. Sometimes this happens because punctuation has gone wrong - for
instance, if you've omitted a semicolon or full stop at the end of the
'say' phrase.


In the line '"Parlare a [regarding the player][t [...] [regarding
nothing][sei] inutile."' conversation framework it by leonardo
boselli, I was expecting that 'te'
would be something to 'say', but it didn't look like any form of 'say' that
I know. So I tried to read 'te' as a value of some kind (because it's legal
to say values), but couldn't make sense of it that way either. Sometimes
this happens because punctuation has gone wrong - for instance, if you've
omitted a semicolon or full stop at the end of the 'say' phrase.


In the line '"Parlare a [regarding the player][t [...] [regarding
nothing][sei] inutile."' conversation framework it by leonardo
boselli, I was expecting that
'stesso' would be something to 'say', but it didn't look like any form of
'say' that I know. So I tried to read 'stesso' as a value of some kind
(because it's legal to say values), but couldn't make sense of it that way
either. Sometimes this happens because punctuation has gone wrong - for
instance, if you've omitted a semicolon or full stop at the end of the
'say' phrase.


In the line '"Parlare a [regarding the player][t [...] [regarding
nothing][sei] inutile."' conversation framework it by leonardo
boselli, I was expecting that 'sei'
would be something to 'say', but it didn't look like any form of 'say' that
I know. So I tried to read 'sei' as a value of some kind (because it's
legal to say values), but couldn't make sense of it that way either.
Sometimes this happens because punctuation has gone wrong - for instance,
if you've omitted a semicolon or full stop at the end of the 'say' phrase.


In the line '"[regarding the player][maiuscolo][ [...] scolo] già
parlando [ap the noun]."' conversation framework it by leonardo
boselli, I was expecting that
'maiuscolo' would be something to 'say', but it didn't look like any form
of 'say' that I know. So I tried to read 'maiuscolo' as a value of some
kind (because it's legal to say values), but couldn't make sense of it that
way either. Sometimes this happens because punctuation has gone wrong -
for instance, if you've omitted a semicolon or full stop at the end of the
'say' phrase.


In the line '"[regarding the player][maiuscolo][ [...] scolo] già
parlando [ap the noun]."' conversation framework it by leonardo
boselli, I was expecting that
'stai' would be something to 'say', but it didn't look like any form of
'say' that I know. So I tried to read 'stai' as a value of some kind
(because it's legal to say values), but couldn't make sense of it that way
either. Sometimes this happens because punctuation has gone wrong - for
instance, if you've omitted a semicolon or full stop at the end of the
'say' phrase.


In the line '"[regarding the player][maiuscolo][ [...] scolo] già
parlando [ap the noun]."' conversation framework it by leonardo
boselli, I was expecting that
'maiuscolo' would be something to 'say', but it didn't look like any form
of 'say' that I know. So I tried to read 'maiuscolo' as a value of some
kind (because it's legal to say values), but couldn't make sense of it that
way either. Sometimes this happens because punctuation has gone wrong -
for instance, if you've omitted a semicolon or full stop at the end of the
'say' phrase.


In the line '"[regarding the player][maiuscolo][ [...] scolo] già
parlando [ap the noun]."' conversation framework it by leonardo
boselli, I was expecting that 'ap
the noun' would be something to 'say', but it didn't look like any form of
'say' that I know. So I tried to read 'ap the noun' as a value of some kind
(because it's legal to say values), but couldn't make sense of it that way
either. Sometimes this happens because punctuation has gone wrong - for
instance, if you've omitted a semicolon or full stop at the end of the
'say' phrase.


In the line '"Parlare a [regarding the player][t [...] [regarding
nothing][sei] inutile."' conversation framework it by leonardo
boselli, I was expecting that 'te'
would be something to 'say', but it didn't look like any form of 'say' that
I know. So I tried to read 'te' as a value of some kind (because it's legal
to say values), but couldn't make sense of it that way either. Sometimes
this happens because punctuation has gone wrong - for instance, if you've
omitted a semicolon or full stop at the end of the 'say' phrase.


In the line '"Parlare a [regarding the player][t [...] [regarding
nothing][sei] inutile."' conversation framework it by leonardo
boselli, I was expecting that
'stesso' would be something to 'say', but it didn't look like any form of
'say' that I know. So I tried to read 'stesso' as a value of some kind
(because it's legal to say values), but couldn't make sense of it that way
either. Sometimes this happens because punctuation has gone wrong - for
instance, if you've omitted a semicolon or full stop at the end of the
'say' phrase.


In the line '"Parlare a [regarding the player][t [...] [regarding
nothing][sei] inutile."' conversation framework it by leonardo
boselli, I was expecting that 'sei'
would be something to 'say', but it didn't look like any form of 'say' that
I know. So I tried to read 'sei' as a value of some kind (because it's
legal to say values), but couldn't make sense of it that way either.
Sometimes this happens because punctuation has gone wrong - for instance,
if you've omitted a semicolon or full stop at the end of the 'say' phrase.


In the line '"[regarding the player][maiuscolo][saluti][maiuscolo] [the
noun]."' conversation
framework it by leonardo boselli, I was expecting that 'maiuscolo' would be
something to 'say', but it didn't look like any form of 'say' that I know.
So I tried to read 'maiuscolo' as a value of some kind (because it's legal
to say values), but couldn't make sense of it that way either. Sometimes
this happens because punctuation has gone wrong - for instance, if you've
omitted a semicolon or full stop at the end of the 'say' phrase.


In the line '"[regarding the player][maiuscolo][saluti][maiuscolo] [the
noun]."' conversation
framework it by leonardo boselli, I was expecting that 'saluti' would be
something to 'say', but it didn't look like any form of 'say' that I know.
So I tried to read 'saluti' as a value of some kind (because it's legal to
say values), but couldn't make sense of it that way either. Sometimes this
happens because punctuation has gone wrong - for instance, if you've
omitted a semicolon or full stop at the end of the 'say' phrase.


In the line '"[regarding the player][maiuscolo][saluti][maiuscolo] [the
noun]."' conversation
framework it by leonardo boselli, I was expecting that 'maiuscolo' would be
something to 'say', but it didn't look like any form of 'say' that I know.
So I tried to read 'maiuscolo' as a value of some kind (because it's legal
to say values), but couldn't make sense of it that way either. Sometimes
this happens because punctuation has gone wrong - for instance, if you've
omitted a semicolon or full stop at the end of the 'say' phrase.


In the line '"[regarding the player][maiuscolo][ [...] do con [the
current interlocutor]."' conversation framework it by leonardo
boselli, I was expecting that
'maiuscolo' would be something to 'say', but it didn't look like any form
of 'say' that I know. So I tried to read 'maiuscolo' as a value of some
kind (because it's legal to say values), but couldn't make sense of it that
way either. Sometimes this happens because punctuation has gone wrong -
for instance, if you've omitted a semicolon or full stop at the end of the
'say' phrase.


In the line '"[regarding the player][maiuscolo][ [...] do con [the
current interlocutor]."' conversation framework it by leonardo
boselli, I was expecting that
'stai' would be something to 'say', but it didn't look like any form of
'say' that I know. So I tried to read 'stai' as a value of some kind
(because it's legal to say values), but couldn't make sense of it that way
either. Sometimes this happens because punctuation has gone wrong - for
instance, if you've omitted a semicolon or full stop at the end of the
'say' phrase.


In the line '"[regarding the player][maiuscolo][ [...] do con [the
current interlocutor]."' conversation framework it by leonardo
boselli, I was expecting that
'maiuscolo' would be something to 'say', but it didn't look like any form
of 'say' that I know. So I tried to read 'maiuscolo' as a value of some
kind (because it's legal to say values), but couldn't make sense of it that
way either. Sometimes this happens because punctuation has gone wrong -
for instance, if you've omitted a semicolon or full stop at the end of the
'say' phrase.


In the line '"(rivolgendoti [ap the noun])"' conversation framework it by leonardo
boselli, I was expecting that 'ap
the noun' would be something to 'say', but it didn't look like any form of
'say' that I know. So I tried to read 'ap the noun' as a value of some kind
(because it's legal to say values), but couldn't make sense of it that way
either. Sometimes this happens because punctuation has gone wrong - for
instance, if you've omitted a semicolon or full stop at the end of the
'say' phrase.


In the line '"Non [regarding the player][stai] parlando [ap the noun]."'
conversation
framework it by leonardo boselli, I was expecting that 'stai' would be something
to 'say', but it didn't look like any form of 'say' that I know. So I tried
to read 'stai' as a value of some kind (because it's legal to say values),
but couldn't make sense of it that way either. Sometimes this happens
because punctuation has gone wrong - for instance, if you've omitted a
semicolon or full stop at the end of the 'say' phrase.


In the line '"Non [regarding the player][stai] parlando [ap the noun]."'
conversation
framework it by leonardo boselli, I was expecting that 'ap the noun' would be
something to 'say', but it didn't look like any form of 'say' that I know.
So I tried to read 'ap the noun' as a value of some kind (because it's
legal to say values), but couldn't make sense of it that way either.
Sometimes this happens because punctuation has gone wrong - for instance,
if you've omitted a semicolon or full stop at the end of the 'say' phrase.


In the line '"Non [regarding the player][stai] parlando con nessuno."' conversation framework it by leonardo
boselli, I was expecting that
'stai' would be something to 'say', but it didn't look like any form of
'say' that I know. So I tried to read 'stai' as a value of some kind
(because it's legal to say values), but couldn't make sense of it that way
either. Sometimes this happens because punctuation has gone wrong - for
instance, if you've omitted a semicolon or full stop at the end of the
'say' phrase.


In the line '"[The current interlocutor] non [rispondi]."' (Leonardo Boselli/Conversational Defaults IT.i7x, line 16),
I was expecting that 'rispondi' would be something to 'say', but it didn't
look like any form of 'say' that I know. So I tried to read 'rispondi' as a
value of some kind (because it's legal to say values), but couldn't make
sense of it that way either. Sometimes this happens because punctuation
has gone wrong - for instance, if you've omitted a semicolon or full stop
at the end of the 'say' phrase.
++ Ended: Translation failed: 36 problems found
Copy Include Conversational Defaults IT by Leonardo Boselli to clipboard Include Conversational Defaults IT by Leonardo Boselli.
Read the original documentation of Version 3 of Conversational Defaults by Eric Eve:
Version 3 of Conversational Defaults IT by Leonardo Boselli begins here.

"Translation in italian of Version 3 of Conversational Defaults by Eric Eve.

Provides a set of rules to facilitate defining default conversational responses for different conversational commands targeted at various NPCs. This extension requires Conversation Framework."

Book 1 - Includes

Include Conversational Defaults by Eric Eve.

Include Conversation Framework IT by Leonardo Boselli.


Chapter - Responses

     unresponsive rule response (A) is "[The current interlocutor] non [rispondi].".


Conversational Defaults IT ends here.